Skip to main content

About your Search

20121027
20121104
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4
that the obama administration green lighted it. >> hold on, charles, those were gaffes in every single case that's what that person believed. only became a mistake when the backlash game and i know that andrea understands this having done campaigns as i do. and you have to know where voters are if you're not between 18 and 30, you don't get the ad. young voters are critical and many have not-- >> and you think this is a good ad? >> i think when you look at the fact, the ad it over 2 million hits on youtube where most of the young voters are-- >> some of the the vulgar things had millions of hits. is there no line, the office of the president of the united states, does it even care anymore about certain things or just pure desperation at this point? >> and charles, when mitt romney is not telling the truth about chrysler going to china, there's a lot to talk about here. so, there's a lot that's going on in in campaign that's up for debate and everyone can say where the line is. i think a lot of lines have changed and through every campaign cycle, that's a disappointment. but when you look at youn
church got into with the obama administration over the obamacare requirement that they provide contraceptive services in their hospitals. the evangelicals have enormous amounts of outreach to people, and they-- to hospitals and such and they saw that this was going to affect them as well, and that the catholic churches fight was their fight. so, they, for those come could nation -- combination of reasons they're ready to vote. stuart: is the evangelical vote big enough to push president obama. >> about 31% in wisconsin, in iowa and 44% in north carolina, and very large in florida as well so this, i think, is a factor, a voting block, flying beneath the radar, media wrote a lot about it in the primary, but not the last month or so. stuart: i see your point well argued, but are the people already counted in the polls which have already been taken and which represent a dead heat or a slight obama victory? >> you know, it's this sort of factor, stuart, that i think is a bit after problem for the polls. i'm not so sure they're picking up voting groups like this or the intensity behi
: austan goolsbee said a few moments ago said the four years of the obama administration created more new jobs, net new jobs than the first four years of the bush's first term. is he right? >> i honestly would have to go back and look at the numbers. neither recovery was as vigorous as one might want. but the right benchmark, it strikes me, it was in your conversation with austan, really is the reagan '81-'82 recovery. that, too, was have a very deep recession. that recession also had a sharp financial element to it. we can have a v-shaped recovery, there's nothing about it that makes it not so. stuart: it the key to tax reform, by tax reform, lower rates on corporations and individuals, and get rid of some loopholes, is that the key to it. >> i think it's an important element and what's first key is to remind the american people, we can do this, we can grow more rapidly, it requires a different policy mix and yes, tax reform is a big part of it, on the corporate side and the individual side. stuart: glenn hubbard, a pleasure, don't be a stranger, come on back, love to see you. thank you,
the obama administration took over this, their main objective was to keep costs high, at least to keep union costs high. >> that's the point with the pension. charles: and burdens general motors to this day which is why we're owed so much money and we're in trouble. >> what bothers me more about the fiasco, the fact that senior debt, and when ways with a in the business, make less debt, but have senior security and they ignored bankruptcy law. charles: and a lot of people, their rational, this would only hurt the fat cats and when we know this hurt a whole lot of people. >> what about the delphi investors who really lost on this one. let's take a look what they did in the gm bankruptcy, it's another case of sub bosub board nating one group. and board says, off shore earnings and makes sense they would not issue their earnings when the markets are closed. you would think they would wait until the market is open. does that mean that ford had, as you said, a good reason to issue them because they were so good. does that mean that people that are issuing them maybe are under what was estimated?
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4